By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Home
  • News
  • Technology
  • Games
  • Review
Reading: Active founders make good investors, but do they make good VCs?
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Active founders make good investors, but do they make good VCs?
May 15, 2023
VC funding of women climate tech founders is abysmal. Here’s how it could improve
May 15, 2023
VC funding of women climate tech founders is abysmal. Here’s how it could improve
May 15, 2023
Vice files for bankrupcy, Foxconn’s investment in India, and two fascinating startup rounds
May 15, 2023
Only hours left to apply to Startup Battlefield 200 at Disrupt
May 15, 2023
Home
Search
  • News
  • Technology
  • Games
  • Review
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
News /

Active founders make good investors, but do they make good VCs?

Published May 15, 2023
Last updated: 2023/05/15 at 10:04 AM
Share

Operator experience has become critical in venture capital over the last few years. Pure-play financial VCs are falling out of favor with startups compared to investors who bring building experience alongside their cash.

But not all operating backgrounds are equally helpful. If a VC has experience in a different field, it may not translate well — if at all — to a startup, and advice around certain business decisions could quickly become outdated. There is a growing group of VC funds led by folks who think they might be better suited to back companies because they are currently startup founders themselves.

These firms and founders may be onto something. Recent data from AngelList, pulled for Flex Capital, shows that the founder-led funds raised through its platform outperformed the other funds raised on AngelList.

In fact, across all percentiles of fund performance, VC funds led by active founders outperformed those without that structure when comparing multiples on invested capital, according to the data. Funds in the 90th percentile saw performance metrics that nearly doubled the numbers from firms without a founder at the helm.

Now, let’s be clear, this data definitely doesn’t give a full picture. For example, we don’t know how founder-led funds compare to operator-led firms. This data set is just based on funds raised on AngelList, which is obviously limiting, and it’s unclear what the structure of these firms look like; some may be led by a founder but have full investment teams.

But it does pose the question: Do active founders make better investors than, essentially, anyone else?

For Jeff Lu, a general partner at Flex Capital, the value of this model is clear.

His firm has three founding partners, two of which are currently working as operators, and Lu, who serves as a full-time investor. “I had to pitch Flex a thousand times over the last three years, and not once have I ever had to explain to a founder why this is better,” Lu told TechCrunch+.

Active founders make good investors, but do they make good VCs? by Rebecca Szkutak originally published on TechCrunch

You Might Also Like

VC funding of women climate tech founders is abysmal. Here’s how it could improve

VC funding of women climate tech founders is abysmal. Here’s how it could improve

Vice files for bankrupcy, Foxconn’s investment in India, and two fascinating startup rounds

Only hours left to apply to Startup Battlefield 200 at Disrupt

This free TV comes with two screens

May 15, 2023
Share
Previous Article VC funding of women climate tech founders is abysmal. Here’s how it could improve
Keyboard Apps Suited for Android Devices
Technology
MGCOOL Explorer 2, built-in gyroscope to achieve image stabilization
Technology

© Giplay News Network. All Rights Reserved.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?